By Sarah Jones
If you’ve read or watched the news recently, you will have seen many stories criticising livestock production for its apparent negative impact on the environment.
The message seems to be simple: livestock, particularly cattle, are the bad guys in the ﬁght against climate change and if we want to make a positive difference, we should stop eating meat and dairy products.
There’s no doubt that livestock farms and the whole agricultural industry have a role to play in tackling climate volatility. However, the current focus on meat and milk production over- simpliﬁ es what is a very complicated subject.
At the recent Sustainable Food Trust conference, sustainable agriculture expert Professor Michael Lee from Bristol University discussed the need to consider all the data connected to farming before making any conclusions about food’s sustainability.
Much of the argument around livestock farming focuses on the global warming potential (GWP) of meat and dairy thanks to animals’ greenhouse gas production.
Using GWP mass-based assessments, forage-fed beef cattle create almost 2kg of carbon dioxide equivalent (known as CO2e, the standard unit for measuring carbon footprints) per 100g of meat produced, while upland sheep produce 3kg CO2e per 100g of meat. Pitted against intensively-reared chicken, which produces less than 0.5kg CO2e per 100g, cattle appear to be much less environmentally-friendly.
What this simple measure fails to grasp is what it really means to be sustainable. Professor Lee believes CO2e was not meant to be used for these purposes because it doesn’t take into account meat’s nutritional value. What’s more, it tells us nothing about which farming systems are the most effective at producing food with the lowest emissions proﬁle.
Professor Lee has created a new way to measure GHGs in meat production by incorporating Recommended Dietary Intakes (RDIs) into the emissions metric.
By using RDIs, the metric recognises beef’s high nutritional value and concentration of vital vitamins and minerals, compared to foods which, on the surface, have a lower carbon footprint.
In practice, scientists using this metric have revealed that emissions from beef cattle reared on concentrates are actually less than 0.05kg CO2e per 1% RDI. That’s a mere fraction of the 2kg CO2e per 100g calculated in the standard GWP measurement, and 1.5 times lower than beef cattle raised on forage.
Even more startling, factoring in nutritious value showed that emissions from those same cows were 2.25-times lower than free-range chicken.
A Danish study conﬁrmed that it could be difﬁcult to fulﬁl the recommended daily intake of nutrients, in particular calcium, if dairy products are excluded from our diet. In the study, Cheese has the highest nutrient density value compared to other food items. When considering the nutrient density and climate impact, cheese is just as good/bad as common staple foods; cod, pork, chicken, brown rice, pasta and potatoes, that aren’t getting a lot of attention or scrutiny.
For a sector facing increasing criticism, being able to demonstrate the nutrient value of what we produce as part of a farm’s wider environmental footprint is becoming an increasingly important tool.
The recently published IPCC report itself commented ‘animal- sourced food produced in resilient, sustainable and low-GHG emission systems, present major opportunities for adaptation while generating signiﬁ cant co-beneﬁ ts in terms of human health’. Livestock can play a critical role not only in feeding the world’s growing population, but also in helping to improve soils, sequester carbon, and provide long-term environmental beneﬁts which can’t be achieved any other way.
Being able to understand and demonstrate a product’s environmental footprint will not only help farmers counter some of the negative press but can also help increase efﬁ ciencies across farms and add value to meat and dairy products.
Promar has its own fully-accredited carbon accounting tool which can help measure farm emissions and help businesses establish and plan for improvements.